Sterilex Ultra Step Vs Liquid Quat Foot Baths

boots walking through sterilex powder on floor

Area of Concern

Sterilex was contacted by a new hydroponic growhouse looking to explore solutions for powder chemistry at critical control points.

Issue

The facility does not have many drains, was concerned that standing water from liquid sanitizers was contributing to microbial growth, and was conscientious about how much water it was using. Additionally, the facility does not have a clean break for hygienic zoning and was concerned about cross-contamination from forklifts entering and exiting the growhouse.

Background

The facility was using a liquid quaternary ammonium (quat) product in foot baths as the only intervention at entryway critical control points. The facility regularly performs environmental monitoring (EMP) swabbing and is primarily concerned with Salmonella and Listeria, and struggles with fungal growth on non-public health surfaces. The customer was looking to reduce water usage and was interested in trying a powder product.

Results

Microbial Testing
Prior to Sterilex Ultra Step application, the plant swabbed and recorded the data for Aerobic Plate Count (APC) and Enterobacteriaceae in their entryway foot pans using only a liquid quat. The growhouse suspended use of liquid quat and applied Sterilex Ultra Step at the recommended amount. After applying Sterilex Ultra Step, the facility saw a complete reduction in APC on footwear and forklift wheels 10–20 ft away from footbaths. Download the case study to view the complete data clearly illustrates Sterilex Ultra Step controlled APC and Enterobacteriaceae bacteria better throughout the day than liquid quat.

Fill out the form to download the full case study.
Get in Touch

Whether you’re inquiring about a specific product, require technical assistance, want to know how to order product or simply want to tell us how we are doing, reach out today.